Wednesday, 28 November 2012
Kill List Research
Nearly a year after a botched job, a hitman takes a new assignment with the promise of a big payoff for three killings. What starts off as an easy task soon unravels, sending the killer into the heart of darkness.
Movie Info
Movie Info
From director Ben Wheatley, Kill List is a mind-blowing genre concoction being called the "#1 Horror Film of the Year" (Bloody-Disgusting). A brilliant blend of family drama, hitman action-thriller and terrifying psychological horror film, Kill List tells the story of an ex-soldier turned contract killer who is plunged into the heart of human darkness. Eight months after a disastrous hit job in Kiev left him physically and mentally scarred, Jay (Neil Maskell) is pressured by his partner Gal (Michael Smiley), into taking a new assignment. As they descend into the bizarre, disturbing world of the contract, Jay's world begins to unravel until fear and paranoia sending him reeling towards a horrifying point of no return
Director: Ben Wheatley
Writers: Ben Wheatley, Amy Jump
Stars: Neil Maskell, MyAnna Buring and Harry Simpson
Genres: Crime | Horror | Thriller
Details
Official Sites: Official site
Country: UK
Language: English | Swedish (a few lines)
Release Date: 2 September 2011
(UK)
Also Known As: Lista za odstrel
Filming Locations: Sheffield, South Yorkshire, England, UK
Budget:
£500,000 (estimated)
Opening Weekend:
$9,838 (USA) (5 February 2012) (2 Screens)
Gross:
$26,297 (USA) (4 March 2012)
Technical Specs
Runtime: 95 min
Color: Color
Awards:
British Independent Film Awards | |||
Year | Result | Award | Category/Recipient(s) |
---|---|---|---|
2011 | Won | British Independent Film Award | Best Supporting ActorMichael Smiley |
Nominated | British Independent Film Award | Best Achievement in Production | |
Best ActorNeil Maskell | |||
Best ActressMyAnna Buring | |||
Best DirectorBen Wheatley | |||
Best Screenplay Ben Wheatley Amy Jump | |||
Empire Awards, UK | |||
Year | Result | Award | Category/Recipient(s) |
2012 | Won | Empire Award | Best Horror |
Evening Standard British Film Awards | |||
Year | Result | Award | Category/Recipient(s) |
2012 | Nominated | Evening Standard British Film Award | Best Screenplay Amy Jump Ben Wheatley |
London Critics Circle Film Awards | |||
Year | Result | Award | Category/Recipient(s) |
2012 | Nominated | ALFS Award | British Film of the Year |
Supporting Actor of the Year Michael Smiley | |||
Puchon International Fantastic Film Festival | |||
Year | Result | Award | Category/Recipient(s) |
2011 | Won | Best Actress | MyAnna Buring |
Nominated | Best of Puchon | Ben Wheatley |
Directed by | Ben Wheatley |
---|---|
Produced by | Claire Jones Andy Starke |
Written by | Ben WheatleyAmy Jump |
Starring | Neil Maskell Michael Smiley MyAnna Buring Emma Fryer |
Music by | Jim Williams |
Cinematography | Laurie Rose |
Editing by | Ben Wheatley Robin Hill Amy Jump |
Studio | Rook FilmsWarp X Film4 Productions Screen Yorkshire UK Film Council |
Distributed by | Optimum Releasing (UK)IFC Midnight (US) |
Release date(s) |
|
Running time | 92 minutes |
Country | United Kingdom |
Language | English |
Budget | £500,000 |
Release Information
Sep 2, 2011 Wide
Dec 26, 2011
Interveiw:
Reviews:
"Kill List" didn't have very positive reviews with only just over half of 'Roten Tomatoes' users liking the film. Considering that Ben Weatley's film debut 'Down Terrance' was praised by critics, they didn't seem to think that this was very good. Maybe it is the outrageously ridiculous story line? Perhaps the blood and gore seems to be too much to handle? Either way, it wasn't the best film that they have ever reviewed. Not by a long shot.
"Kill List" didn't have very positive reviews with only just over half of 'Roten Tomatoes' users liking the film. Considering that Ben Weatley's film debut 'Down Terrance' was praised by critics, they didn't seem to think that this was very good. Maybe it is the outrageously ridiculous story line? Perhaps the blood and gore seems to be too much to handle? Either way, it wasn't the best film that they have ever reviewed. Not by a long shot.
Rotten Tomatoes
All CriticsAverage Rating: 7.1/10
Reviews Counted: 81
Fresh: 61 | Rotten: 20
Audience:
56% liked it
Average Rating: 3.3/5
User Ratings: 6,427
Average Rating: 3.3/5
User Ratings: 6,427
"Kill List" begins with verbal violence at a dinner table, continues with actual violence in a hit-man scenario and concludes with metaphysical violence that threatens to decapitate the movie itself. It's baffling and goofy, blood-soaked and not boring. That it's well-made adds to the confusion; it feels like a better film than it turns out to be.
Roger Ebert
Chicago Sun-Times
Top Critic
Following up his impressive 2010 debut, “Down Terrace,” with something altogether more implacable and strange, the British director Ben Wheatley has gained confidence in his handling of male violence and domestic distress. That assured style is the spackle that holds “Kill List” together: when the plot doglegs into insanity, and the characters follow suit, this brutal fever dream refuses to fall apart.
Andrew O'Hehir
Salon.com
Top Critic
Writer-director Ben Wheatley served up one of last year’s punchiest British debuts with Down Terrace, the story of a common-or-garden Brighton crime family. With his second film, the joltingly scary Kill List, he plunges further into genre territory – but identifying exactly which genre we’re going to wind up in is half the challenge. The less you know in advance, the more potent the feeling of being shoved head-first down a rabbit hole. What’s waiting at the end isn’t a bunny – it’s hideous.
Tim Robey
Daily Telegraph
Top Critic
Thursday, 15 November 2012
Prometheus: 7 Key Areas
- the issues raised by media ownership in contemporary media practice; (how does who owns a media company influence the type of film made and its potential success? For example do BIG companies make BIG films and therefore make all the money? Is it possible for small companies to succeed?)
Together the film production companies spent an estimated $50 million on advertising, $30 million of which came from marketing support from companies including Coors, Amazon, and Verizon FiOS.
- the importance of cross media convergence and synergy in production, distribution and marketing; (how do companies work together to produce, distribute and publicize a film? How can Disney use their size to promote and publicise a film? How can small companies work together to promote their business' when making and promoting a film?)
- the technologies that have been introduced in recent years at the levels of production, distribution, marketing and exchange; (how has the introduction of digital film, 3D, DVD, Blue Ray, internet streaming, downloadable content, home cinema influenced the types of films made, the way we watch them and the way we 'buy' them?)
Set and Veichals- 'Prometheus' is a film which required a lot of special effects. To do this CGI was used when making the alien creatures as well as some of the set and veichals.
Arthur Max designed the sets, including the alien structures and the alien world landscape, and vehicles, including the Prometheus and the Engineer's ship. Digital 3D models and miniature replicas of each set were built to allow the designers to envisage the connections between them and to know where the CGI elements would be inserted
To better blend the practical and the digital, the design team took rock samples from the Iceland location so they could match the graphical textures with the real rocks. To create the Prometheus, Max researched NASA and European Space Agency spacecraft designs, and extended these concepts with his own ideas of how future space vehicles might look.
Creatures- Neal Scanlan and Conor O'Sullivan developed the film's alien creatures, aiming to convey that each creature has a logical biological function and purpose. Creature designer Carlos Huante chose to make the creature designs pale to contrast the black-toned, Giger-influenced aesthetic of Alien. When designing the Engineers (pale scary alien type creatures) Scott wanted them to resemble Greco-Roman gods. Were created by applying bulky, full-body prosthetics to the actors, whose facial features were diminished by the material, and were later digitally enhanced to preserve the "godlike" physical perfection. Scott described the Engineer's as tall, elegant "dark angels". The snake-like alien dubbed the "Hammerpede" was given life through a mixture of CGI and practical effects, and the wires controlling the practical puppet were digitally removed. The mutated "Fifield" effects were achieved mainly through the use of make-up and prosthetics. Due to concerns that the practical effects would be unsatisfactory, the filmmakers completed an alternative version of the sequence, in which Fifield was rendered as "a digital character with elongated limbs and an engorged, translucent head, incorporating a semblance of Harris's face". For its grown form, the "Adult Trilobite", Max found inspiration from an arthropod-like creature from Earth's Cambrian era and the alien octopus in Jean Giraud's illustrations for the comic strip The Long Tomorrow.T he film's last-unveiled creature, the "Deacon", was named by Scott for its long, pointed head that he considered resembled a bishop’s mitre. Shaw and Holloway who produce the Trilobite which impregnates the Engineer, in its design. However, they focused on making the creature feminine, and said that "it was born of a female before being born of a male." Messing drew inspiration for the Deacon's birth scene from the birth of foals, and created an iridescent appearance for its skin, based on the equine placenta.The Deacon's protruding jaw was inspired by the goblin shark.
Visual Effects
Prometheus contains approximately 1,300 digital effect shots.The main effects studio was Movin Picture Company (MPC), which produced 420 of the shots.Several other studios, including Weta Digital, Fuel VFX, Rising Sun Pictures, Luma Pictures, Lola Visual Effects, and Hammerhead Productions, also produced effects shots for the film.
The Orrery-3D digital map-was one of the most complex visual effects, contained 80–100 million polygons, and took several weeks to render as a single, complete shot.
'Prometheus' was released in 3D as well as 2D. It was shot on Red Epic cameras in 70mm DMR with inherent 3D meaning it could be easily transferred from 2D to 3D when creating the shots.
It was released on DVD and Blu-Ray which was also available to download onto iPods and iPhones through the means of Amazon, iTunes, PlayStation and Xbox in over 50 countries. During its first week of sale in the United Kingdom, Prometheus was the number 1 selling film on DVD and Blu-ray Disc, outselling its nearest competitor by a factor of three.
- the significance of proliferation in hardware and content for institutions and audiences; (how and why have film companies had to alter the way they work now everyone has web enabled phones, PC's, consoles etc? How have audiences changed their viewing habits now we no longer need to go to the cinema to watch a film)
- the importance of technological convergence for institutions and audiences; (can you think of examples of how different technologies have come together to help the film industry?)
Films such as Prometheus now tend to be sold to online film distributors, such as Netflix and LoveFilm, as audiences have changed their viewing habits due to the development in technology in media and the film industry. Viewers do not feel the need to spend large amounts of money on a trip to the cinema to see a film when they can either buy it on DVD/Blu-Ray as a long term investment or even rent the film from an online distributor and watch it in the warmth and comfort of their own home. The introduction of home cinema has influenced the way that film companies have to alter the way they work as they have to consider their production, distribution, and marketing to fit the majority of audiences that prefer to watch a film in their own homes and to publicise the other windows that the film has to offer, e.g. DVD, Blu-Ray, online distributors.
Also, with the increasing use of smart phones, the film industry has had adapt to changes when it comes to marketing their product and advertising it. As for the Weyland Industries website, Ridley Scott is able to apply a setting so that iPhone and other smart phone users can view it, increasing the publicity of the film even further. This proliferation in hardware has boosted the publicity of Prometheus even further than the already successful viral marketing. - the issues raised in the targeting of national and local audiences (specifically, British) by international or global institutions; (how do film companies try and attract their audience? Do they do different things in different countries?)
Rumours were that the cost of marketing the film was between $40 and $50 million- very expensive!!! It was important that the film was marketed in a massive way because the more people that hear about it will mean that more people will go and see it when it is at the cinema.
The 'Prometheus' marketing campaign began on July 21, 2011 at the San Diego Comic-Con International, where images and footage from the film were presented by Lindelof and Theron; Scott and Rapace participated via satellite contribution. A segment of the footage showed Theron performing naked push-ups, which attracted much attention. A teaser poster was released on December 14, 2011, with the tagline, "The search for our beginning could lead to our end." A bootleg recording of an incomplete trailer was leaked online on November 27, 2011, but was swiftly taken down by Fox. The full proper trailer was released on December 22, 2011.
On March 17, 2012, Scott, in partnership with AMC Theaters, hosted the premiere of the first full Prometheus trailer at the AMC Downtown Disney during WonderCon in California. The event was streamed live via Facebook, Twitter, and the AMC Theater website, and the trailer was posted on AMC's Youtube channel immediately after its debut. Reactions to the trailer from WonderCon attendees, and on Twitter, were generally positive, and it received nearly three million views in the three days following its release. On April 10, 2012, media outlets were shown a 13 minute montage of scenes in 3D from the film's opening at the Vue Cinema in Leicester Square, London. The screening, and in particular the 3D visuals and the performances of Fassbender, Rapace, Theron, and Elba, was well received.
On April 29, 2012, the international launch trailer debuted in the United Kingdom on Channel 4 during the first advertisement break of the TV show Homeland. Viewers were encouraged to share their opinions about the trailer on Twitter, some of which were then shared in a live broadcast during a later break. This was the first time that viewers' tweets were used in a broadcast advertisement. A competition, offering viewers a chance to win tickets to the film whenever the social platform Zeebox detected the advertisement airing, was launched on that site.
Although marketers typically avoid promoting adult-oriented films in order to reach a broader demographic, the film attracted several promotional partners including Coors, Amazon, and Verizon FiOS, which were estimated to have spent $30 million in marketing support. Amazon directed interested users to purchase tickets through Fandango, and placed promotional material in products shipped to customers; this was the first time that Amazon had allowed such marketing by an external company. The premiere in London was streamed live via the film's website and the Verizon FiOS Facebook page. The event was facilitated by BumeBox, which took audience questions from social sites and gave them to reporters to ask at the event.The National Entertainment Collectibles Association (NECA) is developing a series of Prometheus action figures, scheduled for release in September 2012. A book, Prometheus: The Art of the Film, containing production art and behind-the-scenes photographs, was released on June 12, 2012
VIRAL CAMPAIGN:
-A viral marketing campaign began on February 28, 2012, with the release of a video featuring a speech by Pearce, in character as Peter Weyland, about his vision for the future. Set in 2023, the video presents a futuristic vision of a TED conference, an annual technology and design event held in Long Beach, California. The segment was conceived and designed by Scott and Lindelof, and directed by Scott's son, Luke. The production was made in collaboration with, and made available through TED because Lindelof wanted to introduce new audiences to the conference itself. Lindelof said that the scene takes place in a futuristic stadium because "a guy like Peter Weyland—whose ego is just massive, and the ideas that he's advancing are nothing short of hubris—that he'd basically say to TED, 'If you want me to give a talk, I'm giving it in Wembley Stadium.'"
-During the 2012 WonderCon, attendees at the film's panel were given Weyland Corporation business cards that directed them to a website and telephone number. After calling the number, the caller was sent a text message from Weyland Corporation that linked them to a video that was presented as an advertisement for the "David 8" android, narrated by Fassbender. An extended version of the video, released on April 17, 2012, lists the android's features, including its ability to seamlessly replicate human emotions without the restrictions of ethics or distress. A full page "David 8" advertisement was placed in The Wall Street Journal: a Twitter account operated by a David8, that allowed Twitter users to ask the character questions, was included.
-Another video, "Quiet Eye", starring Rapace as Shaw, was released on May 16, 2012, and debuted on the Verizon FIOS Facebook page. In a telephone call monitored by Yutani, a fictional company from the Alien series, Shaw requests Weyland's aid to seek out alien life.
-Another video followed in September 2012, featuring Elba's Captain Janek preparing for a mission.
All of this was in aid of getting a buzz going for the film.
- the ways in which the candidates’ own experiences of media consumption illustrate wider patterns and trends of audience behaviour. (what is your opinion on the above? Do you see the developments as a good or bad thing?)
Monday, 12 November 2012
Prometheus: About
Prometheus on Prezi
Prometheus: Ridley Scott Interview
Director Ridley Scott tells Cath Clarke why he's making a science fiction comeback
Sci-fi films are as dead as westerns. There’s nothing original. We’ve seen it all before. Been there. Done that.’ So said Ridley Scott in 2007 and sounding absolutely, categorically final, which he was about it. Five years later the 74-year-old director blusters a bit gruffly when I remind him of his death-knell speech: ‘Errm. Did I?… I wish I hadn’t said that.’ He’s just given a press conference in a Leicester Square cinema unveiling 11 minutes of his new sci-fi film. Yes, sci-fi – and not just any old sci-fi. Unless you’ve been on Mars, you can’t have missed the juggernaut of hype and expectation behind ‘Prometheus’ – which started life as a prequel to ‘Alien’.
‘Prometheus’ is set late in this century, when two archeologists (one Christian, the other atheist) discover what they believe is a clue to the origins of human life: the same cave paintings in ancient ruins in different countries. The paintings turn out to be cosmic maps, and the pair embark on a mission aboard the starship Prometheus – named after the Greek god who was punished for giving humans fire (nastily too: his liver was pecked out by an eagle every morning, only to grow back that day). So we don’t need the trailer – with its desperate disembodied howl: ‘cut it off!’ – to tell us that this meeting with our makers may not end in a warm glow of halos.
Scott comes across as every bit the Hollywood survivor: a man who’s had to fight his fair share of corners. In a career of highs (‘Alien’, ‘Blade Runner’, ‘Gladiator’) and lows (‘GI Jane’, ‘A Good Year’), he’s watched studios carve up his films and critics misunderstand them (they blasted ‘Blade Runner’: ‘No one knew what the hell I was doing. No one got it. And then they ripped it off’). A ‘helmer’ in the truest sense of the word, Scott steers epic tanks of movies. How does he stop them careering out of control? ‘By casting very strong actors. I think I’m pretty good at casting. I take my time. Because everyone has to defend their island. They’ve got to be able to survive the process.’ He talks like this, in short, snappy sentences – his accent mixing Teesside (where he grew up) with Americanisms (he lives in LA). He was knighted in 2003, but earlier gave a journalist a ticking off for calling him ‘Sir Ridley’. He’s plain Ridley.
He won’t call ‘Prometheus’ a prequel (‘I think I’ve been quite successful in resurrecting a notion but going off at a new tangent’). But he’s craftily given us plenty of enticing nods to ‘Alien’, not least in the casting. Noomi Rapace, playing one half of the archeologist duo, looks every inch a heroine in the Ripley mould. Scott watched her twice as kick-ass feminist avenger Lisbeth Salander in the original ‘The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo’ before meeting her. (Though she may not be so tough in real life – she had to get Michael Fassbender to open her mineral water bottle at the press conference.)
Fassbender plays an android, David (the ship’s butler), and he’s the character Scott is most enthusiastic talking about. There’s a great scene, he explains, where David is pouring a drink for a tipsy crewman, who’s ribbing him about not being human: ‘Are David’s feelings hurt? Is he pissed off? How far is he away from being dangerous?’ And how far from being human, presumably – if he’s feeling human emotions? ‘Exactly right. And it evolves beautifully at the end.'
Androids with soul-envy. It’s a paradox at the heart of Scott’s two modern masterpieces: ‘Alien’ and ‘Blade Runner’ (his most personal film: made after the death of his older brother, it’s filled with loss). Like the gods, androids are stronger and smarter than humans, yet they long for human flaws, to feel what we feel. God occupies the director’s thoughts more than He used to, says Scott, who’s an agnostic, converted from atheism. ‘You could have ten scientists in this room. You could ask them all: who’s religious? About three to four will put their hands up. I’ve asked these guys from Nasa. And they say: When you get to the end of your theories, you come to a wall… you come to a question. Who thought up this shit?’ Scott was turned off religion by his Church of England upbringing (‘altar boy… terrible burgundy wine… all that stuff’). Now? ‘Now my feeling goes with “could be”.’
Next up for the self-confessed workaholic is another future-set film, a ‘Blade Runner’ sequel. Does he stay on top of new technology to keep up? Not massively. ‘I’m not avid. I flick through Scientific American and National Geographic.’ And what about the future? Does he buy into the ‘doom and apocalypse’ vision of what lies ahead? ‘No. I try to be positive. I’m fundamentally a positive person. Otherwise I wouldn’t be doing some of the insane movies that I do.’
Monday, 5 November 2012
How is Media Convergence important for audiences and Institutions?
Q: How is Media Convergence important for
audiences and Institutions?
With the growing use of media convergence,
the film industry has become more extremely successful. Marketing, distribution
and exhibition all heavily rely on cross media convergence as it ensures that there
is a market for the film in order for the film to be a hit. Audiences are now a
lot more aware of the production of films which is driven by media convergence.
During the production of the British film ‘Attack
the Block’, cross media convergence was also used to virally market the film
using social networking. They made a twitter account, posting occasional teaser
posts to entice their audience to see the film before its release, however this
wasn’t used enough to create the buzz which was necessary to really help the
film gain recognition. Cross media convergence was also used when a variety of
smaller film companies joined together in order to finance the film. Synergy
was used when Big Talk Productions, Film 4, Studio Canal and the UK Film
council all joined together to achieve the final outcome of the film. It was
important that this happened as otherwise the film wouldn’t have been a
success. ‘Attack the Block’ is a British film with a small budget. All of the
companies which worked on the production of ‘Attack the Block’ are small and have
a lot of experience working on other small budget so it was expected that the
film would succeed. It is important that ‘Attack the Block’ has the backing of
all of the smaller film production companies as the experience and knowledge of
all four will ensure that the film can be the best that it can be. They managed
to get $13 million for the making of the film and which paid for the film
production as well as advertising for the film in the usual ways; tv adverts,
film trailers, teaser trailers, official UK and US trailers, exclusive
interviews with the cast and director as well as creating a soundtrack which
was available for purchase when the film was released. After all of the marketing,
‘Attack the Block’ was still only small budget which, crossed with being
British, was a disadvantage when trying to promote the film, especially outside
of the UK.
The film ‘Kick Ass’ is also a British film,
however it worked with larger film production companies which could provide larger
budgets for the film which amounted to $30 million. These companies include Universal
Pictures (which is one of the big six film production companies in Hollywood),
Marv Films, Lionsgate and Plan B Entertainment (owned by Brad Pitt). This was
an advantage for the film ‘Kick Ass’ as the companies are much larger and
operate on larger scales the ‘Attack the Block’ and are therefore able to market
and advertise the film more heavily. The well known film production companies
would have been an attraction for the film as people know them and will know
that their standards are high meaning the films will have met those standards. As
well as this, the film had already gained a fan base from the comic books,
which the film was based on, released by Marvel Comics. This was useful when
promoting the film as the target audience had already heard of ‘Kick Ass’ and
will be able to use word of mouth in order to create a buzz for the film. This mixed
with the promotion which included social networking sites, tv adverts, film
trailers, posters and a soundtrack which was available for purchase after the
film had been released. The film also had film reviews on sites such as ‘Rotten
Tomatoes’, forums and blogs which helped create a positive view of the film so
people went to see the film at the cinema. As well as this, the film was
followed from the filming until when it hit the screens by film magazines ‘Empire’
and ‘Total Film’ which also gave it positive reviews, urging readers to go and
see it. All of these advertising methods crossed with an excellent cast (including
Nicholas Cage; who has a huge fan base) helped the film to become a massive hit
in the box office and DVD/Blu-Ray sales.
Another example of a film which uses cross
media convergence is ‘Rise of the Planet of the Apes’. This is a film which
required a large budget due to the extensive use of CGI. Because of the large
expense, (completing the on screen monkeys took 3 stages, all of which had to
be executed in different parts of the USA as specialist equipment and
technology were required) it was necessary that cross media convergence was
used in order to come up with the money needed. The film budget was $93 million
which was generated by Twentieth Century Fox (one of the Hollywood big six),
Chernin Entertainment and Dune Entertainment, all of which have experience
working on big budget films. This is important because they know that in order
to create a brilliant film they need to give time and a lot of money. This
money paid for the film production and the film promotion which consisted of tv
adverts, film trailers, international trailers as well as a whole range of
viral videos showing monkey intelligence. All of this helped to raise awareness
of the film and helped persuade people to go and see the film. This joined with
the incredible cast, including James Franco, Freida Pinto and Tom Felton (from
Harry Potter attracting fans of the wizard film series to the science fiction
action adventure film) helped to make the a success at the box office which
grossed over $450 million worldwide.
Media conversion is becoming increasingly important
in the film industry as there is a correlation between a films budget and a
films success. Technology is also advancing fast shown by things such as viral
marketing becoming more prominent in the marketing of films as well as the use
of social networking being used to create a word of mouth buzz for many films. Facebook and twitter are
becoming very important when marketing films; there are over 100 million active
twitter users and over 750 million facebook users so the audience that the film
promotes to via social networking sites is amazing. Also, over 500 years worth
of YouTube videos are watched each day leaving a huge place for films to post
videos of the film trailers, teaser videos and cast/crew interviews. This helps
to create a huge amount of promotion through word of mouth which hopefully
generates lots of money through people seeing the trailers and then the film. This
plays and essential role in the success of a film as without it, the target
audience wouldn’t know about the film making it a flop at the box office
proving that there would be no point in creating the product as it would end up
not selling.
Thursday, 1 November 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)